Sunday, March 27, 2011
Blog 5
Thursday, March 10, 2011
The joy of a graphic organizer!
I am all for graphic organizers! I actually use them quite often in my teaching. When reading Improving Adolescent Literacy, I learned a few things. I did not realize how complex they are at first. Teachers literally have to teach students how to use them! Now, I have to admit, I have never done that! I simply explained what was on the paper and what needed to be placed in the empty parts. I also have thought about using graphic organizers for assessments; however I thought it would cause rote memorization, and students really would not learn anything, just where a word goes on a particular map. I have to admit, this book does have some truth as to why graphic organizers as assessments are good. The true measure of understanding is the ability other learner to construct an answer, and graphic organizers will evaluate that. The only problem I have with it is it is all too similar with matching tests. If you have students write or place one answer in a particular place, it opens the opportunity for cheating. I have actually performed an assessment where students were given a long piece of colored paper and twelve slips of paper on it. They were to match the different types of nouns to the best example. It was a very hard to watch everyone to make sure they did not cheat. When I graded them, some that I would think would not have done well did. That was mainly the reason I thought cheating was going on.
Like I mentioned, I do like graphic organizers. Even though you should teach them, and they could be a hassle to grade and explain, I still believe they are better for some students; especially visual learners as well as kinesthetic learners.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
To Read or Not to Read
While reading Readicide, by Kelly Gallagher, I become conflicted. I am an English teacher and I also teach a reading class for students who have trouble reading. In the last half of chapter 3, she talks about the way teachers give reading. She says, “I contend that teachers are setting students on the road to readicide by overteaching books. In teaching academic texts, students are drowning in a sea of sticky notes, worksheets, and quizzes.” When I read this, I was a bit confused. I know when I was growing up; this is what we did, especially in English class. Sure, I did not like most of it, but I knew that I was going to be quizzed on a certain novel, and I had to understand it in order to get a good grade on the test.
I agree with her saying that this strategy is not proficient in helping increase a student’s love for reading; however, it is a way to make sure a student is reading. By discussions, handouts, journaling, and yes tests, teachers are able to assess whether the student understands the book or not. I think reading the book is not the problem; they can read. It’s the comprehending what they have just read.
I think it is a great idea for students to be able to take time out of “regular classes” and read for ten to fifteen minutes a day. I think the teachers, administration, and county officers should sit down and figure a way to get this started in all schools nationwide. It should not have anything to do with their English class or any other class that teach novels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)